"I wasn't asking unless he was breathing. That's it.

"I wasn't asking unless he was breathing. That's it.

Every newborn, whether in Bucharest, Târgu-Mureș, Mediaş or Botoşani, has the right to receive the same care and the same chances at life. A foundation is investing in equipping maternity wards in smaller towns to make the previous phrase a reality.

***

For 50 days, Mădălina waited to be Stefan's mother. For seven weeks, she waited to hold him in her arms, feed him, provide him with the care he needed. 

Born prematurely in Botosani, her child was transported to Suceava, where she fought for every second of her life. During this time, my mother stayed in Botosani, waiting for the phone or the daily message that would tell her that it was good. 

On November 28, 2021, at the maternity ward in Botosani, Mădălina prematurely gave birth to her third child. "Mum, here's the baby," the on-call doctor told Madalina as she weighed it. He had a kilogram and a few hundred grams and fit them in his palms, at least that's how he imagined. She did not get to hold him to the chest, nor to caress him. It was the last time she saw him so close to her. Seven weeks followed in which I "didn't ask unless I was breathing. Very much. I was afraid." 

Mădălina is 25 years old and has two more children, aged 5 and 2. He lives in the Ungureni commune in the county, located 28 kilometers from the maternity ward in botosani. The third pregnancy was normal, just like the first two. Regular check-ups and her general condition did not give her any reason to care, but in the 30th week of pregnancy, the first contractions appeared, while taking a bath. She called her husband, and at 11 p.m. they were in the hospital.

"When I got here, I had bleeding and I was told I was going to give birth, but they would try to stop my contractions, maybe the baby stays for at least a few more hours to do the injection for the development of the lungs," she says. They managed to "postpone" the pregnancy for two days, and on Sunday, after 5 p.m., her baby gave birth at 1,250 kilograms. 

"After I gave birth, I first asked what it was like, if it was whole. The doctor told me that yes, he just took my baby. A few minutes later, the doctor who was on call came and told me that he had to send the child to Suceava," she recalls. 

 

 "Can I see him at least a little bit before I leave?"

That weekend, the child was transferred to Suceava, and she remained in Botosani. She spent only a few moments with him, right after his birth, and now he was to be transported to another ward, to another city, without her being able to go with him. In those days, everything was black before her eyes. "I was told this: if you are not called it means everything is fine," but for her there was no good. "But I as a mother, at that moment, could no longer think of good. I didn't think for a second about the good. When I got home, I would look at the other kids, but my thought was always that he wouldn't be anymore," says the mother. 

On Tuesday morning she was discharged, and the first trip she made with her husband was in Suceava. In about an hour, they were in front of the building where the child was hospitalized, but they were hit by bureaucracy: "you have to make a request first," the doorman told him. He didn't even have anyone to call from the hospital. He didn't know who to talk to. 

„Am plecat marți seară de la Suceava, am ajuns acasă, iar a doua zi dimineață mă sună de la spital să-mi spună că mi s-a aprobat cererea. Doar mama are voie câteva minute, o dată pe săptămână, și să duc ceea ce mi s-a spus: pampers și șervețele. Doar atât are nevoie”, își amintește Mădălina. 

On Wednesday morning he was there, thinking of finding out something about his child. The visits started only at 15.00, and the only response she received from a nurse was that "she is fine". 

„Am vorbit cu o doamnă asistentă care era de la bebeluși, mi-a spus că doamna doctor care avea grijă de copilul meu nu era acolo. Am întrebat-o pe asistentă dacă totul e bine, a zis da și doar atât. Mi-a spus să vorbesc cu doamna doctor, eu neștiind când să o găsesc. Sunam pe secție, însă nu aveam voie să sun decât după ora 12, dar doamna doctor pleca la ora 12. Stăteam cu gândul că nu știu nimic, până într-o dimineață când m-a sunat dumneaei și mi-a explicat doar că e bine copilul. ”

 

"We know how to handle a more serious case, but we didn't have anything to do with"

Prin astfel de cazuri trec nenumărate mame din județul Botoșani. Deși are în jur de 400.000 de locuitori conform recensământului din 2011, județul are doar două maternități, cea de la Dorohoi, de nivel I și cea de la Botoșani, cea mai mare, care deservește întregul județ, având nivelul II. 

Maternitatea din Botoșani are propria sa clădire, special construită pentru acest scop în 1983 (o raritate în infrastructura românească), însă potențialul clădirii nu a fost atins niciodată. În acest loc au loc cele mai multe nașteri din județ – circa 2.800 pe an. La Dorohoi nu se nasc decât circa 50 de copii pe lună, fără patologii, iar compartimentul de neonatologie încă nu are un medic neonatolog. Orice copil cu probleme ajunge la Botoșani, iar în ultimii zece ani presiunea a crescut pentru că alte spitale orășenești și maternități din județ (Darabani, Trușești, Săveni) au fost închise. 

"The fact that we are self-sufficient motherhood has advantages and disadvantages. The disadvantage is that here we are only maternity, and the other structures are at the County Hospital (n.a. at a distance of 600 meters), we have access to them, but they are not in the same building. Before I didn't have an ultrasound," says Carmen Zaboloteanu, head of the Neonatology Department. And for a troubled newborn, even waiting for an analysis, the consultation of another specialist can influence the state of health. 

Medicul Zaboloteanu a ajuns în Botoșani în 2014, după terminarea studiilor la universitatea ieșeană de medicină. În primele gărzi și-a dat seama de decalajele care există între dotarea unui spital din Iași și a unuia din Botoșani. În 2014, începea să se schimbe „vechea gardă” cum spune ea, iar odată cu asta, a vrut să îmbunătățească și modul în care echipa lucrează cu pacienții și nou-născuții. 

 "There was a child who was born at 600-700 grams, and the doctors who were then here found that that child was an abortifacient and behaved as such. I had learned that that child had a chance and I tried to intervene over the attending physician, but I was told no. It has no chance, do not torment yourself because even if it lives, it will be a baby-vegetable. We said it's not like that and we need to try to change the mindset," she recalls. 

With small steps, this came out. At the moment, the team consists of young staff, taught by the same teachers, who believe in the same values as her: the child is worth saving at all costs. 

The next stage was to grow and modernize the maternity apparatus, so that the county's children would not be immediately transferred to Suceava – where there was a higher level maternity – or to Iasi or Târgu-Mureș.

"A lot has been done in the last five to six years. The interface has changed and there is still work to be done, but if we look at some studies, two or three years ago, the infant mortality at the level of Botosani County placed us on the second place in the country, after Tulcea and now I think we went about halfway. We were 12% and now we are somewhere around 6%," she says. 

 

"Poor pregnancy tracking in a poor region increases pressure on the neonatal team in decision-making"

For Botosani, a county with an underdeveloped infrastructure and always in the first places among poor counties, access to a medical service is extraordinarily difficult, and mothers are among the victims who suffer the most. "There are mothers who do not reach the doctor," says the head of the ward, but you cannot accuse them of carelessness. They have another 5-6 children at home, they do not have a car, they do not have money to transport to the city, and some services – such as better ultrasounds – cost money that a mother in a village does not have. 

A recent case is that of a mother from the commune of Frumuşica, 60 kilometers from the city. The child needed a blood transfusion, but the mother could not come to the hospital. "I don't have the money to come, to get that blood sample," the doctor's mother told her. "That's kind of what the majority of kids with problems are like. The mother who can't stay in the hospital with the child because she still has children at home, but she can't even come to him to see him. And let's send it on? Much less, because they have no money."

Dr. Zaboloteanu remembers another mother, who already had two children, who carefully followed her third pregnancy and made regular visits to the doctor, but at the time of birth, the team found that the newborn had severe birth defects. The mother should have done a morpho-fetal ultrasound, which is only done in university centers and which costs a lot of money. 

This case – rare enough – shows what it means for a mother not to have access to the necessary medical services. "If the child had had a congenital malformation and had been born directly in a university center that performs the surgeries, the child would have benefited from all the treatment from the first hours of life," she says. 

Untracked pregnancies are in a fairly high percentage in the county – 20-30% – and this puts more pressure on the medical team, because the life of the newborn may depend on some machines that the maternity ward does not have or that are already occupied. And in order to send him to a higher-level maternity ward, the newborn must be stabilized in the first place. 

Now, the ward has two ventilators. "But we are on guard and the third and the fourth may appear, you do not know what to do at that moment," says the colleague of the head of the department, Dr. Paraschiv. 

„La început, când am venit la spital, a fost unul copil cu pneumotorax, nu aveam ventilatorul modern, aveam unul vechi care nu făcea niște presiuni și nu aveam cum să îl pun pe aparat. Acel copil a fost 12 ore ventilat manual. Făceam cu rândul ca să ventilăm copilul”, își amintește ea. 

"It seems normal to me that the one who is born Romania has the same chance as the one who is born anywhere. Why should it be different?"

At the moment, one in ten newborns is premature, and the rate of transfers to the hospital in Suceava or to others in the country is 5-10%. The rate has dropped because the medical team wants to make sure that a transfer is not a handy solution, but the last step it takes. "We could very conveniently transfer. That's it, we can't, we rest assured that the salary goes, time passes, the pension comes, but... I don't know. We have invested so much time to learn a certain specialty and it is a pity. We want to make the young doctors not feel that it is different what is happening here compared to the medicine they have learned", says the doctor.

So they have always learned new procedures, they have trained from all the specialists who arrive on visits or from those they turn to for help. 

„Marea noastră problemă aici sunt malformațiile congenitale de cord. Nu avem un medic cardiolog pediatru la nivelul județului, iar la nivelul județului vecin sunt trei-patru, și atunci eu și colegii mei am încercat să învățăm de fiecare dată să recunoaștem și să le tratăm până nou-născutul ajunge la specialist”, povestește ea. 

Au primit donații cu care și-au dotat secțiile, de la alte organizații, dar și de la botoșăneni, au apelat la autoritățile locale. În momentul de față, maternitatea are 55 de paturi, din care 15 pentru terapie intensivă neonatală, un număr comparabil cu cel al secției din Suceava, de nivel superior. Diferența ține însă de personal.

There are currently four doctors, but until last year there were three, an insufficient number to cope with births and treatments. Carmen Zaboloteanu remembers when one of the doctors gave birth, and she and the other doctor had to ensure the operation of the hospital.

 "That meant that 15 days I would stay in the hospital, start in the morning and finish the next day at noon, about 30 hours continuously," she says. They were doing 15 guards, while the monthly maximum is six. The third colleague returned to work after two months. The arrival of the new colleague already gives them more space, but ideally it would take 6-7 doctors. 

„Problema este că suntem în capătul țării, unde nu sunt medici. Dorohoiul nu are medic neonatolog, ci este o linie de gardă cu pediatria comună, a existat Maternitatea Săveni, dar s-a închis pentru că nu este medic acolo”, adaugă ea.

For the head of the ward, every birth completed and every premature birth saved means more trust from the community, because a mother must feel that she is in good hands. 

There are mothers who prefer to give birth here, because the cousin or neighbor was fine. But there is still a lot of work to be done and there is a lot to educate. Underage mothers continue to be a widespread phenomenon all over the country, and in 2020, 86 underage mothers arrived here. 

„E oarecum frustrant pentru noi și pentru ele, pentru că nu prea înțeleg ce înseamnă un nou născut cu probleme. Ele au mers pe premisa că totul va fi bine. Mai au un copil sau doi acasă, la care totul a mers bine fără analize, fără investigații și trebuie să le explicăm de ce nu este bine. De multe ori le vorbim, le povestim și la final ne spun «dar în rest este bine?». Pentru mămici, nașterea înseamnă doar baloane și ursuleți de pluș și e greu să înțeleagă că poate fi o problemă cu copilul și sunt foarte vulnerabile”, povestește ea. 

In addition, once they have given birth to healthy, trouble-free babies, mothers do not follow the list of consultations they should do with discharge. There are eye checks, in some cases, cardiological ones, which are postponed until a problem occurs. In this regard, she wants to equip the ambulatory so as to offer both day hospitalizations and checkups for which she would otherwise have to go to Iasi or Suceava. 

"For mums, childbirth means only balloons and teddy bears; it's hard to understand that it can be a problem with the child" 

"Transportation is a risk," said the head of the department. Beyond the shortcomings on the spot, the safest method is "transportation into the womb", but as 20-30% of the pregnancies that arrive in Botosani are untracked, the mothers often arrive much too late. As in Madalina's case, the doctors try to postpone the pregnancy through drug treatment, but when it is not possible, the stabilization is made, and only then the transfer follows. Then other unknowns appear: if there is a free place in Suceava, then it is tried in Iasi or Târgu-Mureș (when a helicopter already has to be ordered). Every moment lost means a greater risk to the child. 

"The disadvantage is that Suceava does not have a neonatal ambulance and does not have staff. And then the transfer is made by our city ambulance", says doctor Zaboloteanu. "We have a transport fan of our own that we lend to the ambulance. One of the fans can become mobile and then leave with the baby. We once wanted to send a child to Târgu-Mureș and he called us from the road that the incubator on the helicopter had broken down. That's when the child left with all of ours." 

"The nurse saw me desperate. I just wanted to touch it."

With the transfer another problem arises: the separation of the mother from the child. Like Mădălina, there are countless other mothers who remain in Botosani, without being able to be close to their child. 

Pe Mădălina, Crăciunul a prins-o acasă, fără să fie alături de cel de-al treilea copil. „Stăteam într-un colț pe pat, cu telefonul în mână, și așteptam să primesc un mesaj sau să se facă ora 12 la Suceava și să mi se spună că e bine”, era rutina ei în fiecare zi, iar de sărbători fiecare zi departe de copil a devenit insuportabilă. 

"If I felt like crying, I would go outside. If the little boy caught me, I would tell him that my head hurts, something hurts me. He caught me once that I was looking at a picture of him and I was saying he was someone else's baby," she says. 

The eldest boy knew he was pregnant and was about to have a new brother. He was curious and asked her "why doesn't his belly grow anymore", but she wanted to protect him and told him "baby is in the belly, but you pray to God to be well". Until the moment he brought Eduard Stefan home, the child did not need to know the mother's suffering. 

Every week, he was only allowed 5-10 minutes to visit. He would do 150 kilometers for each visit, where he could not take him in his arms, feel his warmth or tell him that everything would be fine. She looked at him, from a distance, at the protected baby in his incubator. 

La naștere, copilul avea 1,25 kilograme, în următoarele săptămâni a pierdut din greutate și a ajuns la un kilogram. Eforturile echipei de la Suceava s-au concentrat, în primă fază, pe stabilizarea funcțiilor vitale și a organelor. Până la finalul anului 2021, cu fiecare telefon pe care ea-l făcea se pregătea pentru ce-i mai rău, dar Eduard Ștefan „a luptat pentru viața lui în fiecare secundă”, iar din ianuarie, următorul pas era luarea în greutate. 

On Monday, January 17, Mădălina told the children that she was going to the hospital to bring Eduard Stefan. That's when they also showed them the picture she wore all these days.

„După atâtea luni, săptămâni, zile în care nu am putut să-i fiu alături, că mă simțeam o mamă neputincioasă, că nu pot să ajut bebelușul cu nimic”, Mădălina urma să fie alături de copilul ei. În aceeași zi, s-a internat în spital, cu gândul că „mă lipesc de el și nu mai plec de acolo”. 

Copilul era stabil, a fost transferat fără nicio problemă la maternitatea din Botoșani, dar până la atingerea greutății de 2,5 kilograme, urma să rămână în spital. De data asta, alături de mama lui. 

 "Yesterday I changed it the first time, I was already afraid of it breaking," she says. Now she measures every drop of milk the baby swallows, sits and looks at it. "Last night I don't know if I've had enough ten minutes," she says. 

 

Pe 20 ianuarie, avea circa 2,3 kilograme, ceea ce însemna că puteau pleca împreună curând la restul familiei. Însă pentru Mădălina, sănătatea copilului contează mai mult: dacă e să mai stea și o săptămână, nu-i nicio problemă. 

In all these weeks, she admits that Dr. Zaboloteanu was one of the people who gave her the courage she needed. "I trusted her," the mum said, while listing countless phones she gave her. 

"For me he was the best doctor. May God give him health, I came to terms with the idea of seeing that the doctor every day was interested in information about the child, even if she was not on guard," says Madalina. 

"We have struggled a lot to keep motherhood at level 2"

For many mothers like Mădălina, the separations could disappear or could be shortened, if the maternity ward of Botoșănene had the necessary infrastructure. The head of the section makes small steps every day, and from this year, she managed to equip the section with vital equipment for premature newborns, thanks to a funding of almost 900,000 lei coming through the program of Vodafone Romania Foundation, Life for Newborns. 

Among these devices there are also two ventilators, which will increase the availability of the ward and will be able to provide vital support to more newborns, because at the moment, more than 2-3 children could not take care of the ward. 

Mai mult, cu ajutorul noilor aparate vor putea controla cantitatea de oxigen pe care fiecare nou-născut o primește, pentru că în funcție de gradul de dezvoltare al plămânilor, depinde și concentrația de oxigen. „Blenderele pe care le-am cerut vor fi pentru sălile de naștere și vom începe reanimarea pentru copiii prematuri cu oxigen în cantitate mică, nu cât avem acum, 30%”, detaliază șefa secției. 

Aceste aparate vor ajuta echipa doctoriței să-și îndeplinească misiunea și să simtă că pot oferi tot ce pot nou-născuților din Botoșani. Rata transferurilor va scădea, iar mamele vor putea să rămână alături de copii lor încă din prima zi. Viitorul lor nu va mai depinde de locul în care se nasc sau de momentul în care se nasc. 

***

Six months later, Madalina and her baby are fine. The fears disappeared with each day that Edward Stephen ate and gained weight. He kept his word, and regular visits to the doctor gave him more peace of mind. "We're really good," she says. 

Text made for the Life Fund for Newborns of Vodafone Romania Foundation. 

Photos by Petruț Călinescu for Vodafone Romania Foundation. 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Editorial Board Recommendations

Subscribe to our newsletter

There are people who have been waiting for 20 years to receive a social housing

There are people who have been waiting for 20 years to receive a social housing

The Common Front for the Right to Housing fights so that anyone can live in decent conditions. Convincing the authorities that people have this fundamental right is more complicated than it seems.

Text by Teodora Săvoiu and the FCDL team

*The photos belong to the FCDL organization

A lady waiting for social housing on Prelungirea Ghencea was pregnant when she first filed the file. This year, her child finishes high school and she still hasn't got the home. Unfortunately, it's not a singular story.

Sunt oameni care așteaptă de 20 de ani să primească o locuință socială. În tot timpul ăsta, stau în chirie sau la familie ori la prieteni. Lipsa unei locuințe adecvate îți taie ani din viață, te îmbătrânește, îți afectează sănătatea fizică și psihică.

Ofensiva Generozității (OG) a fost creată în 2006 de către un grup de artiști. Ulterior, o parte din persoanele implicate în OG s-au solidarizat cu persoane care erau în pericol de evacuare în zona Rahova-Uranus-Sabinelor. Împreună cu familiile din zonă, au adunat o rețea consistentă de sprijin împotriva evacuărilor din locuințele retrocedate din București, formată din vecini, artiști, studenți și studente. Au devenit, în timp, o comunitate.

Cum a pornit FCDL

Frontul Comun pentru Dreptul la Locuire s-a lansat în 2013-2014, la inițiativa comunității de persoane evacuate din Rahova-Uranus, alături de rude ale acestora, prieteni, activiști, artiști, ONG-iști. Luptăm pentru dreptul tuturor oamenilor la locuințe adecvate. Vrem să atragem atenția că nu doar persoanele cele mai precare sunt în risc de a-și pierde o situație locativă decentă, ci oricine poate ajunge în risc dacă trece printr-o perioadă dificilă, de exemplu dacă își pierde veniturile sau are probleme de sănătate. Ne uităm și la persoanele queer, cele divorțate, văduve. Sunt multe situații de vulnerabilitate locativă și e important să ne solidarizăm și să cerem ca dreptul tuturor la locuire adecvată să fie asigurat.

Lucrăm direct cu familiile în teren, dar o bună parte din activitatea noastră se duce în acțiuni de advocacy, de petiționare, oferim sprijin legal familiilor, sprijin emoțional să își depună actele. E nevoie de o comunitate de oameni care să vină împreună. În activitatea noastră avem nevoie de avocați și pentru mamele singure care au numele tatălui copilului în certificatul de naștere și care au nevoie de acord de la tată, chiar dacă el a ieșit din peisaj. Avem nevoie de solidaritatea medicilor pentru că oamenii aceștia dezvoltă probleme de sănătate mai devreme. Avem nevoie de sprijin pentru avorturi, pentru că mamele care au condiții de locuire precare nu vor să mai aducă pe lume alți copii. E o muncă ce trebuie să continue.

When efforts are increased

Moments of evacuation create a strong urgency and solidarity. But also the periods after the evictions mean petitions, protests, audiences, contact with the press. In the case of the families in Rahova and Uranus that I was talking about earlier, all this time after the evacuation they were super-active. They turned one of the disco spaces in the neighborhood into a community center – La bomba was called – and the group formally became an association.

In 2014, when the great evacuation of over 100 people from Vulturilor Street took place, the families had been in contact with the FCDL, but also with the activist families in the Rahova-Uranus area. The battle for the Eagles lasted 2 years, but we tried to make sure that the families there were ready.

Preparation means that:

  • Families must submit their social housing files or renew them;
  • Families need to know that eviction is not legal if there is no eviction court order; then, the family must be summoned that they have lost the trial and be stipulated in the court document in how many days they have to leave the home;
  • The family has the right to oppose eviction if the procedures are not carried out.

Next are families from the communities we work with who have not received social housing. Of those who received distributions in the block on Prelungirea Ghencea, some have been waiting for two years to actually move into their homes. Some of them are on the priority lists at the Capital City Hall, which does not provide housing at the moment.

What kind of housing are we talking about?

We have 3 categories of housing:

Locuințele sociale = acordate persoanelor care nu au posibilitatea să își asigure o locuință adecvată, fie a lor, fie prin plata unei chirii. Sunt acordate de primării.

Locuințele de necesitate = strict pentru persoanele cărora le e distrusă locuința sau care au nevoie temporar să fie mutate. De exemplu, oamenii sunt mutați aici în caz de incendiu, inundație, când când blocul lor e în curs de consolidare. În general sunt goale. Există locuințe de necesitate în proprietatea primăriei. Ei ar avea puterea să le schimbe statutul și să le facă locuințe sociale, dar nu fac asta. Locuințele care rămân fără moștenitor în zilele noastre devin de necesitate.

Vechiul fond de stat = locuințe rămase la stat după 1989, de la persoanele fără moștenitori; e neclar cum se distribuie și nu se distribuie pe listele de locuințe sociale.

Investing in social housing could cost the city hall a little, which can build these homes from funds from the Ministry of Development. It is not too much of an effort for a budget like that of the capital.

 

Something interesting to add here is that the authorities have no obligation to make public only the social housing, not the ones of necessity or from the old state fund.

 

And then what about the saying "Romania is a country of owners"?

 

 

Apropo de România ca „țară de proprietari”: statistica oficială care este interpretată greșit sau cu rea voință se referă la procentul de gospodării care se află în proprietate privată. Dacă te uiți cu atenție, din toate gospodăriile proprietate personală, proprietar e o persoană, nu toată familia. De aici și posibilitatea de a deveni vulnerabil, de care am pomenit mai devreme. Nu ești cu numele pe actul de proprietate, atunci cresc șansele să ajungi într-o situație în care locuirea să îți fie pusă sub semnul întrebării.

How do you work with families and people in communities?

The Housing Syndicate is a part of fcdl and involves support in the field. It is the most demanding work, that of direct relationship with state institutions. The job in the field is important as a test for the advocacy part.

People especially need moral support, because there's a lot of hassle. Some people need help because they don't know how to read. All the information about the papers, how many times you go back, what counter, who you talk to, is overwhelming. We help people make the housing files, the welfare files and other documents that they need.

Some of the people we work with self-organize, but what's important to remember is that every community is unique. What went on the Eagles doesn't work anywhere else, but we support every family and learn from every experience.

Colaborăm cu avocați pro bono pe partea legală. Avem voluntari pe cercetare și pe PR. Pentru susținerea directă în teren, banii vin din donații personale care sunt sub formă de sprijin solidar – nu caritate, ci sprijin solidar. 

Cel mai greu e să vezi cât de mult se stresează oamenii că sunt în pericol de rămâne pe stradă, mai ales iarna.

În plus, îți dai seama și că oamenii din autoritatea locală se poartă mai bine cu tine, dacă presupun că nu ești rom și că nu ești sărac. Dar dacă observă o vulnerabilitate la tine, dacă vii cu copiii, dacă ai abilități diferite fizice sau mentale, atunci parcursul tău devine mai greu, infantilizant, umilitor.

About housing, in figures

Together with the Housing Block, we did a research in 2018-2019 and estimated how many households were affected by the evictions. We are talking about hundreds of thousands of evictions.

Legea locuinței este foarte bună: ea spune că toate persoanele care au sub venitul mediu, dacă nu au o locuință în proprietate și nu își permit o chirie de pe piață, au dreptul la locuință socială.

Although the law exists, there is a large number of people who need adequate housing – in Bucharest alone, over 20,000 applications had been submitted, of which 4,000 were renewed. We estimate that the actual number is two or even three times higher.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Editorial Board Recommendations

Subscribe to our newsletter

The other children

The other children

Refused by the authorities and by a large part of society, children from two marginalized communities in Maramureș receive a chance from NGOs.

Text by Angela Sabău

Photos by Silviu Gheție

Ajungem la Ponorâta după un drum ce șerpuiește printre dealuri domoale, ce par pustii în decorul tomnatic al Țării Lăpușului din Maramureș. O clădire nouă, aflată dincolo de o poartă larg deschisă, apare de după o curbă. Este școala cu clasele I-IV din Ponorâta și câteva zeci de copii care învață aici se află acum în pauză și umplu curtea cu veselia lor asurzitoare.

The little ones welcome the representatives of the Reality Check association, who came together with a team of journalists, and the teachers are trying to keep them in check. 

Privirile lor pătrunzătoare se ascund repede în pământ dacă încerci să vorbești cu ei. Unul mai curajos, a cărui chică roșcovană ne aduce aminte de un Nică din „Amintiri din copilărie” ale lui Creangă le răspunde jurnaliștilor, dar după câteva cuvinte se intimidează și își ascunde capul rușinat, după alți colegi. În sprijinul lui sar alții și îl ajută cu explicațiile. „E repetent”, justifică unul dintre copii, referindu-se la „Nică”.

Have big dreams

When asked about school, everyone likes it. One of the little girls wants to make herself a "doofress", another a policewoman, and a boy boasts that she likes mathematics. But the dialogue is short, because together, they mobilize each other and the larma begins again. 

Cu greu reușesc învățătoarele să-i alinieze în fața intrării și să intre în sala de clasă în mod organizat. În ajutorul lor vine o mamă din comunitatea de romi din Ponorâta, dar și alte două membre care sunt acolo permanent. Știu că vor primi daruri, pentru că au venit doamnele Iolanda și Nadia „de la Asociație”. Așa că intră în clasă, unul câte unul. În câțiva ani, când vor încerca să iasă din mica lor bulă a comunității de romi din care fac parte, acești copii vor avea parte de un contact dur cu prejudecățile celor din jur. 

Chance at education

For 10 years, the Reality Check Association has set out to give these children a chance and facilitate their access to education, the only thing that can change their lives. And their involvement is bearing fruit, slowly but surely. 

They started in 2011, when they first came into contact with this community. The representatives of the association, Iolanda Burtea and Nadia Gavrilă, talk about the problems they have been fighting for 10 years in Ponorâta. "There are two types of problems that the association in general is facing. One is that of funding — which is related to us as a foundation and the problems we find in communities, at the "grassroots". We all believe that the big problem in poor communities is education, and that's where we need to start; to bring the children to school. In both communities where we work, and here (in Ponorâta, n.r.) and in Castelu (Constanta County), this is a challenge", says Nadia Gavrilă.

And the results are visible. If 10 years ago, the attendance at school was 10-15%, at present it has climbed up to 80%. 

Food coupons, a reason to go to school

One of the methods by which they convinced parents to send their children to school was to offer food coupons, worth 50 lei per month. Although the amount seems small, in families with many children and very poor, this amount makes a difference. 

Proiectul început inițial cu asociația OvidiuRo, care obținea și finanțările necesare de la diverse companii private, a ajuns să fie implementat prin lege în toată țara, după ce și-a dovedit utilitatea în peste 40 de comunități. Proiectul viza doar copiii de grădiniță. „Programul Ponorâta l-am pornit din 2012 și l-am început așa: OvidiuRo, din 2010, avea programul cu tichetele, care era un program public-privat între comunitate, ONG și primărie. ONG-ul venea cu tichetele sociale care erau condiționate de prezență – 50 de lei pe lună de copil, dacă venea zi de zi. 

Through OvidiuRo there have always been private financing, from companies and individuals", reports Iolanda Burtea. 

In contrast, the involvement of those in the vicinity of poor communities was non-existent. Especially because, at least at the time when they began to get involved, conflicts with the rest of the community were quite frequent, especially during the harvest period, when the harvests tempted the most needy. "That's when you're used to surviving from one day to the next and you see the potato there... On the one hand, I try to understand them. On the other hand, to change things in a community like this, where there are hundreds of illiterate people, it takes time. You can't overnight," she says.

Small but definite progress

Lucrurile s-au mai schimbat între timp. „Am făcut grădini, i-am învățat să-și cultive singuri. Am pornit de la 15 grădini și am ajuns la vreo 80 acum. Pe terenul pe care-l au, le dăm semințe să-și pună ei în grădini”, mai spune ea. Și schimbările se văd, nu doar aici. „În primul an în care am dat cadouri de Crăciun,  a doua zi majoritatea erau prin sat să vândă ce-au primit. După al doilea sau al treilea an am văzut copiii jucându-se cu ce au primit. Mai sunt și acum care mai vând, dar nu la același nivel. Există progres, dar nu ai cum să-i schimbi pe toți, nu dintr-o dată”, mai arată ea.

Asociația derulează acum un program cu fonduri norvegiene, prin ACF (Active Citizens Fund). „Proiectul cu Norvegia se numește «Împreună pentru un viitor mai bun în Coroieni». Echipa locală lucrează integrat: adică asistentul social, cu asistentul medical comunitar, cu mediatorul școlar. Avem în vizor 30 de familii pe care le urmărim mai îndeaproape, dar o masă caldă primesc toți copiii care vin la școală. Tichetele sociale sunt oferite acum și pe criterii de performanță școlară, nu doar pe prezență”, mai arată Iolanda Burtea.

Progress is small and other generations need to come to see major changes.

Pyrite, the place with invisible children. Not registered anywhere

Locul numit „Pirita” din Baia Mare înseamnă același lucru pentru băimăreni, ca și Ponorâta pentru cei din Coroieni. Un loc pe care să-l ocolești, dacă poți.

Perimetrul acum plin de iarbă nu mai amintește de sursa numelui său. Aici însă a fost un depozit de pirită – deșeu minier pe care o companie a reușit în cele din urmă să o exploateze și să ecologizeze zona. Conform normelor, sunt interzise construcțiile sau plantarea copacilor, deoarece acestea ar străpunge stratul impermeabil din adâncime și ar permite solului poluat cu metale grele să pătrundă în stratul de la suprafață. Dar când singura ta grijă este să supraviețuiești și mâine, grija unui pericol pe care nu-l vezi pălește. Așa că, odată zona ecologizată, în scurt timp a fost populată. S-a creat o comunitate defavorizată, caracterizată de sărăcie extremă, lipsită de acces la educație. Colibele lor au fost demolate după câțiva ani și oamenii au fost mutați de acolo, însă după un timp au venit din nou și și-au făcut alte colibe. 

Claudia Costea, who worked until a few years ago at Child Protection, now says that the first contact with this community had a very big impact on her, so she began to get involved, as much as she could, to help them. Initially, as a volunteer, because the state, through the institution he worked for, did not have resources. So, after several years of volunteering, I was able to make an NGO that deals with this community.

Programs for parents and children

La fel ca și la Ponorâta, principalul obiectiv este educația celor mici. La urma urmei, de aici pornește totul. Asociația Pirita Children are grijă de familiile de la Pirita de aproximativ șase ani. Se preocupă ca acești copii, dar și tinerele lor mame (uneori, și ele niște copii) să primească educația necesară și, de multe ori, cele trebuincioase.

At the headquarters of the association, which is located near their area, the little ones, along with adults, have all kinds of programs. From after school, to parenting or mother and child, or gardening. They all have the role of bringing a little light into their lives.

The children here were integrated into nearby schools. In fact, the president of the association, Claudia Costea, says that this was one of the big problems she struggled with, besides that of financing. 

In the end, the children were welcomed to a school, and when you see them all in the benches, it seems that their life goes naturally, according to an ordinary social pattern. At school they get a hot meal, are in a clean environment and receive education. They seem clean and much quieter and less rowdy than those at Ponorâta. But that's also because there are fewer of them and can be better trained. 

But after they leave the classroom, their lives return to a different normality. One that is only theirs and little known to those outside their community. 

Small but steady funding

Claudia Costea's story in Pirita began long before the foundation of the association. She approached the community and began volunteering, offering a helping hand to families and children. She had the support of a network of supporters, professionals or donors, both at home and abroad, and the association was founded to ensure that she could gather as many resources as possible for Piritea's children.  

A group of supporters in Belgium donated a way in which the association now operates, near Pirite. It is the very place where we meet with the president of the association and try to have a dialogue. However, we are constantly interrupted by children, who come up with various problems. A 12-year-old girl says she didn't get to school, saying she felt unwell. Two other children enter the room with a fairly high frequency. They come in and out, they ask questions, they accuse each other and eventually they are invited to take an apple from the crate that is next to the door and wait outside. In fact, they are interested in "grains" for dogs, which they saw at a nearby dog shelter. After they are promised that they will also receive for their dogs, things calm down. They are just children who need attention, the warmth of a home and to show them someone a little confidence.  

Children "invisible" to society

"The hardest work was before setting up this association, because I thought it was very important to do something and it was clear that the priority was the children and their access to school. That's what we started with," she explains. The community counts around 130 children, aged from 0 to 16 years. "After 16 years they are considered young, but they behave like adults," says Claudia Costea. In fact, many of the girls of this age become mothers.

The first problem he faced from the beginning was that the parents did not have an address on the bulletin. That is why, until a few years ago, these children were never enrolled in school. 

 "The strange thing is that no one noticed this, neither the parents nor the authorities. But going to school is the most complicated thing in the world, if you live at Pirita. The first hindrance is that you don't have a file. Most families do not have a ID card with an address. They have a provisional id," she says. And for enrollment in school, this is elementary. "Schools do a census every year with children living on the streets assigned to that school. But as a community such as Pirita is illegal, from the start it is not assigned to any school. So, no one counts in advance the children from Pirita", says the president of the association.

The first enrolled in the school are those with all the documents in order and who are assigned to that school. "At the second registration round, late files are solved, but still by address. It's only at the third stage that files like this are solved, but then it's very easy for a school to say it doesn't have any more places. Or, 'if we get the children, we put them all together.' And that's how segregated classes are formed, which are very dangerous," she explains. 

No "warm receptions" at school

On the other hand, even so, they are not well received at school. "The schools, the headmistresses, the teachers, when they hear that children are coming from Pirita, begin to invoke all kinds of imaginary problems: that the other parents will take their children to take them elsewhere, that those from Pirita will get problems, they will come with lice, with aggressive behaviors. Of course there is this possibility, but this is how they keep postponing their registration and it cannot be done naturally," she complains.

Beyond that, a hindrance comes from their own parents, who do not understand the importance of education, as they are uneducated, in turn. "They grew up begging on the landfill and became parents being mostly children, so they mature with their children", says Claudia Costea.

Then there is extreme poverty. "This means that if a parent does not understand the importance of education, he will not change his habits over the day, to take care of preparing the child for school. Which means to go to bed on time, to make sure that there are clean clothes, to have something to eat for breakfast, to put food at school, to have a watch to wake up at 7.00 and all this does not happen naturally in the mind of a parent who does not understand the role of school. And then somebody has to take that responsibility. That's what we did," she explains.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Editorial Board Recommendations

Subscribe to our newsletter

Scammers, smiles and a bit of understanding

Scammers, smiles and a bit of understanding

We talked to the executive director of the Parada Foundation, Ionuț Jugureanu, about how the needs of those in vulnerable situations have changed, about how the artistic approach of the organization works and about the state's responsibility regarding the children and young people in the street.

Text by Vlad Odobescu

Ionuț Jugureanu learned of the terrible situation of street children in Romania after he had already moved to Belgium for several years. He had left in the summer of 1991 to study sociology and remained there, determined to live far from the country. He had lived the University Square and became part of a huge wave of young people disappointed by the path romania had taken with the miners. 

At one point, he saw on Belgian public television a report that followed the life of a couple of street children over the course of a year. Gigi was 17, Monica was 15, and they survived together at the North Station. It was during that year of filming that their baby girl, Bianca, was born. Over the years, after returning to Romania and starting to work to help the street children, Ionuț would meet Bianca, who is now 26 years old. She's married, has three children, and "she's fine." It's just proof, among many things, that even lives started in the streets can have happy turns if there is enough help.

*

În 2002, după ce s-a întors în România motivat de o situație de familie, Ionuț Jugureanu a deschis un restaurant în centrul Bucureștiului, împreună cu un prieten. Apoi a lucrat la „Salvați Copiii”, ca director de marketing, corporate, partnerships și comunicare. „Deci n-aveam un contact foarte clar cu partea socială. Era mai curând o chestie de a aduna resurse pentru organizație. Adică nu vedeai copiii sau nu vedeai serviciile: eram în sediul central, la birou și la întâlniri”. 

Apoi însă l-a cunoscut pe Francesco Aloisio, care — ca și acum — conducea consiliul director al Fundației Parada. A aflat atunci primele lucruri despre activitățile Parada: era o organizație mică, de teren, care făcea lucruri concrete. Fusese creată în 1996 de clownul franco-algerian Miloud Oukili, care — cu un nas roșu și mingi de jonglerie, a coborât cu copiii în canale, s-a jucat cu ei pe stradă și reușit să le câștige încrederea, laolaltă cu un zâmbet. Era o abordare complet nouă pentru România acelor vremuri: combina circul social, adică implicarea copiilor în crearea de momente artistice, ce le aduceau bucuria de a fi în mijlocul celorlalți și aplaudați, cu acoperirea unor nevoi esențiale, cum ar fi o masă, îngrijiri medicale sau ajutor pentru întocmirea unor acte. „Circul social e foarte bun pentru că e un mod de interacțiune, în care le dai o ocupație. E legat de copilărie, e amuzant. E pe de-o parte sportiv, pe de altă parte poți crea o coeziune de grup, să-i faci să aibă încredere în ei, să aibă încredere în ceilalți. Când faci piramida umană, de exemplu, trebuie să ai încredere în cel care te ține, pentru că dacă n-ai încredere nu îndrăznești să te urci pe umerii lui”, explică Jugureanu. 

He joined the organization in 2008, shortly after meeting with Aloisio, and became executive director. 

Deși peste România trecuseră aproape 20 de ani de democrație și țara devenise deja membră a Uniunii Europene, situația copiilor străzii nu se schimbase substanțial. „Știind ce am văzut când am venit în Parada și uitându-mă la filmele din anii ’90, nu era nicio diferență. Erau grupuri mixte de copii, adulți, tineri, fete și băieți. Pentru ei, fuga în stradă era o alegere rațională, spune Jugureanu. „Și era o alegere a celor mai vioi și mai inteligenți dintre copii, care își dădeau seama că viața devine sau este insuportabilă acolo unde se află, că e vorba de orfelinat sau de familii abuzive. Și ajungeau în stradă pentru că strada era preferabilă. De obicei nu erau din București, dar luau trenul și ajungeau în București. Stăteau câteva zile sau o săptămână-două. Pe urmă se mai întorceau acasă sau la centru, mâncau bătaie și plecau de-a binelea. Și rămâneau în stradă. Dar era o alegere asumată și conștientă.” 

"The child alone in the street is a failure of the system. You can't pretend you're a responsible state and have kids in the streets, right? They all passed, sooner or later, longer or shorter, through institutionalization. So, if they fled institutions, it's because they were being abused, beaten, starved, tied up, raped. And that's the direct responsibility of the state, an active responsibility."

The groups that were forming were staying in fairly populated areas. The most famous place was, of course, the North Railway Station, but there were smaller or larger gangs all over the city, usually around a canal. They were more structured and less structured groups; there were self-helping groups, real communities, and others abusive, in which relationships of dependency and domination were created between the leader and the members of the group. In almost all of them, aurolac was consumed, and since 2010 — the so-called ethnobotanicals, legal and cheap drugs that quickly littered Romania's cities and wreaked havoc. Children died on their heads, not from overdose, but from associated diseases, especially when they did not have access to medical services. 

And the state did not assume any responsibility in relation to the fate of those children, although it had collected VAT on those products sold, and companies registered with the Trade Register paid taxes for this activity. In fact, the whole state had brought these children to the streets and left them on their own. It was not just an absent state, but one complicit in the drama of these children and young people, an aggressor state. "The child alone in the street is a failure of the system. You can't pretend you're a responsible state and have kids in the streets, right? They all passed, sooner or later, longer or shorter, through institutionalization. So, if they fled institutions, it's because they were being abused, beaten, starved, tied up, raped. And that's the direct responsibility of the state, an active responsibility."

The parade entered the world of these children as it could. There were tricks and smiles, but there were also social interventions at the mouth of the canal at night, when the rest of the world forgot about them. When they went to their "home", the social workers did not try to impose rules on them, but wanted to establish a relationship with them and find ways to help them. 

With time, the children managed to become more autonomous. Some managed to make a family, to have a job, sometimes also a house. And every step is complicated to take. For example, it's hard for them to get a job not because they don't work, but because they quickly end up in a situation of vulnerability to an employer. Many find it hard to trust that they can get their money only after working for a whole month, so they prefer black jobs, from which they can earn something at the end of each day; and these jobs are, most of the time, very precarious. 

With the house it's complicated again, because they lived without paying rent. "And even if they get to afford to pay a rent, it's very hard to convince them to do it, because they've always lived in places they've gone to, installed themselves and stayed as long as they could, in bad, poor conditions. But it's clear that the cat needs to be broken, because it's complicated to raise children in places where you don't have running water or toilet." 

What does a success mean in this world? It's hard to find a case that illustrates an ideal situation, says Jugureanu. For some, it's a success that they survived for a year. That can be a greater achievement than doing one college for another. It always depends on where you're going.

*

In the 26 years since the Parade existed, Romania has gone through profound changes, and the organization has adapted to the new types of needs. In the last decade, the number of minors who end up on the street is much lower, and the canal-dwelling has been abandoned. There are no more orphanages like those of the 80s or 90s, and children usually reach the age of adolescence in social apartments, where — in theory — they acquire skills for an independent life. "But the staff that manages those apartments is not very well paid. Perhaps they do not have the proper means either, and children sometimes look at this transition to the social apartment as a new abandonment. I mean, they were in a family, and now they're being thrown with some other kids their age into a place that they didn't choose, they didn't want," and that's where the film can break for some —fewer, that's right —who drop out of school and end up in the street. In addition, today there are whole families living in abandoned houses without minimum conditions. Sometimes former street children have become parents and have a new battle to fight for their children.   

On average, the foundation has about 250-300 beneficiaries of all ages, people who access one or the other of the services over the course of a year. The parade has a day care center, the core of the social and cultural activities of the foundation, where the beneficiaries receive school, professional, social, medical or psychological support; it is also the place where cultural and artistic activities are carried out. "Some come quite often, either for the circus, or to take a shower or wash their clothes, for the soup. Others come when they need id documents, they have problems with justice, with the police, with the doctor, girls who become pregnant. Or for a disability certificate, to do their documents," says Jugureanu. 

Also very important is the Social Caravan, which involves direct contact with those on the streets, from dark until midnight. The Social Circus continues, which takes the form of lint shows, dance or theater, with which children and teenagers sometimes participate in tours. An important project of the foundation is now the construction of a day care center, for which there is an available land and an architectural plan, but for the construction of which a lot of funds are needed. 

Și relația cu instituțiile statului s-a schimbat cu timpul. Azi, acolo lucrează mulți oameni care s-au format în ONG-uri, iar asta a făcut foarte bine sistemului public de protecție socială și de protecție a copilului. Instituțiile sunt mult mai accesibile pentru colaborări, iar ușile se deschid mai ușor. Per ansamblu, însă, statul e rămas în urmă: „E un stat neoliberal violent, cu foarte puține transferuri sociale. E un stat care nu face decât să crească decalajul între cei bogați și cei săraci.” 

Sunt însă oamenii obișnuiți din societatea românească de azi mai solidari cu cei aflați în nevoie? „Din păcate, e o constatare evidentă: cu cât societatea are un grad de bunăstare de mai multă vreme și mai bine instaurat, cu atât ea va fi solidară. E foarte greu să soliciți solidaritate în societăți sărace, anomice, cu dificultăți în a-și rezolva propriile probleme.” Devii solidar când tu, familia ta și cei apropiați ție aveți un anumit grad de securitate a prezentului și a viitorului. 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Editorial Board Recommendations

Subscribe to our newsletter

"I don't know if there's any 'calling.' What I know for sure is that I can't stand aside."

"I don't know if there's any 'calling.' What I know for sure is that I can't stand aside."

Cristina Săracu activează în zona LGBTQIA+ de la începutul anilor 2000, când subiectul era foarte greu de dus în fața publicului larg. Nici astăzi, proiectele LGBTQIA+ nu intră în topul priorităților celor care susțin mediul ONG, dintr-o falsă teamă că societatea nu e pregătită pentru acest subiect. „Schimbarea nu se întâmplă însă pur și simplu, o facem noi atunci când alegem să ne implicăm”, spune Cristina Săracu. 

Fotografii din arhiva personală Cristina Săracu

 

De ce ai ales să te implici în acest domeniu nonguvernamental? Care a fost chemarea?

The first step in my involvement as a volunteer was somewhere in the '90s. Then it seemed as if a chasm was deepening between those with a real chance and those forgotten by society, by decision-makers, by everyone. And it wasn't just a category: there were the children for whom school became even more difficult to access, there were the elderly deprived of power and minimal resources, they were the ones discriminated against, vulnerable and always left behind.

Am simțit atunci că nu pot şi nu vreau să stau deoparte, că e nevoie de fiecare dintre noi, că orice ajutor cât de mic face undeva diferența. Mi-au rămas în memorie dorințele unor copii dintr-un sat fără drum, care îl rugau pe Moș Crăciun să le aducă săpun, un prosop, un burete de șters tabla şi cretă. Eram la primele proiecte de voluntariat… 

În zona LGBTQIA+ am ajuns când am descoperit Asociația ACCEPT. La începutul anilor 2000, era un subiect tabu oriunde în societate. Acolo am fost „voluntar pe furiș”: să nu se afle la job, să nu mă știe nimeni. Încercam să ajut cu ce pot. Trăiam cu teama de a nu fi dată afară de la serviciu, erau toate fricile adunate în gândurile fiecăruia dintre noi. Aș fi vrut să pot face mai mult, într-un fel eu reușisem să-mi găsesc echilibrul, dar vedeam atât de mulți oameni aproape striviți de bătălia cu propriile trăiri şi cu mediul atât de ostil…  

I don't know if it's any "calling." What I know for sure is that I can't stand aside, I can't pass by someone who needs help without caring, without trying to do something.

What does the relationship with the community look like? As part of the NGO sector, do you feel that you have been supported and understood your mission? If so, does this support also translate into concrete actions (involvement through volunteering, donations, etc.)?

Subiectul LGBTQIA+ este încă foarte complicat în societate, aproape nu vorbim despre asta. Este o comunitate profund invizibilă cu excepția celor foarte tineri, deși am tot făcut pași, deseori timizi şi cu certitudine încă prea puțini. Am văzut însă în ultimii 20 de ani cum, pe măsură ce înțeleg, oamenii trec de la neutralitate la deschidere şi uneori devin aliați ai comunității. Discuția este în fond despre drepturi, șanse egale şi nediscriminare de orice fel, dar din păcate nu avem încă dialoguri consistente despre ce înseamnă LGBTQIA+, iar informațiile sunt deseori trunchiate sau pur şi simplu neadevărate. Relația cu comunitatea din oraș, din regiune, este încă la început, punem punți şi încercăm să deschidem dialogul.

The good news is that when people are open to listen, to ask without offending, when we are listened to with the desire to understand , hostility disappears.

Solidaritatea umană nu cunoaște bariere. Am trăit asta în martie, într-o încercare de a ajuta un adăpost LGBTQIA+ de la Liov. Am avut alături oameni excepționali care ajutau oameni: Ioana Vârtosu de la Asociația Școala Mamei Junior şi o mână de oameni din toate colțurile lumii. Pentru ei era irelevant din ce minoritate fac parte cei pe care-i ajutăm. Şi așa cum știm că orice donație ajută, orice mână în plus la descărcat un tir de ajutoare înseamnă foarte mult, iar o vorbă bună spusă celui care e la capătul puterilor e neprețuită.

Despre aliați pe bune vorbesc şi imaginile de la Pride (la București, Timişoara, Cluj sau Iași). Mergeți la Pride și o să descoperiți o mulțime de aliați: mame cu copii, părinți sau bunici, prieteni, colegi, veniți cu toții alături de noi să ne susțină. Pentru mine e şi un marș al solidarității.

Cristina Săracu şi Mihaela Marcu - Bucharest Pride 2021

What do you think are, at the moment, the big obstacles for NGOs in this area?

Din perspectiva comunității LGBTQIA+ e încă mare, mare nevoie de dialog, de voci coerente şi echilibrate — cei care pun punți şi construiesc împreună o largă înțelegere a ceea ce suntem, a nevoilor reale.

The main obstacle is the lack of understanding of what it means to be an LGBTQIA+ person , plus all kinds of prejudices, stereotypes and often totally untrue information.

Şi clasica replică: „nu e momentul să vorbim despre asta, sunt teme mult mai importante”. 

În plus, încă sunt foarte puține ONG-uri în domeniu.

Have you ever felt that the work your organization does is less attractive to partners and sponsors in the country? Have you received rejections from some partners?

În mod evident subiectul e mai puțin atractiv pentru partenerii și sponsorii din țară, iar replica cea mai „simpatică” e: „nu am nimic împotriva voastră, eu vă susțin, dar nu public”.

Rejections are usually a "not now" or simply lack of an answer.

În mod paradoxal, drepturile omului, cele despre care vorbim, nu intră în topul priorităților celor care susțin mediul ONG (sponsori, parteneri). Nu știu de ce limitarea drepturilor şi libertăților este privită ca un subiect secundar, deși duce la situații dramatice de multe ori.  

Există o falsă teamă că societatea sau comunitatea va reacționa negativ la acest subiect (că nu e pregătită), că vor pierde din simpatie şi susținători dacă se implică ȋntr-un proiect LGBTQIA+, că „e un subiect sensibil şi mai bine îl evităm, poate peste câțiva ani va fi altfel”. 

Change does NOT happen, we do it when we choose to get involved. The things we're not talking about don't work out by themselves.

But we also have to talk about the glass half full. I have met in foreign companies and very open allies, who are waging in their organizations unspoken battles to change the mindset. If we manage to have an honest and coherent dialogue, the change is obvious. I discovered openness and concrete, authentic supportive actions. 

Îți vine în minte o poveste din rândul beneficiarilor voștri care să te fi marcat în acești ani și te-a făcut să continui munca?

There are many stories gathered, often the fact that things did not turn out as I had hoped became the motivation to do everything better next time, in the next project.

Am în minte o discuție cu unul dintre primele grupuri informale LGBTQIA+ din provincie. Era prin 2004, înainte de primul Pride de la București. Era mai mult un grup de prieteni care visa să schimbe lumea. Ne întrebam atunci ce putem face la Timişoara? Cum să gestionăm valurile de ură şi reacțiile acide? Păstrez în memorie imaginea unui băiat căruia ȋi era greu să spere că va fi mai bine, nu-şi găsea drumul. Era foarte tânăr şi părea doborât de reacțiile cumplite ale familiei şi nu numai. Mă întreba atunci: „De ce trebuie să mă ascund? Cu ce am greșit?”. Am petrecut seri lungi povestind, căutând răspunsuri, dar parcă găseam mai multe întrebări. El a avut noroc: este astăzi psiholog și încearcă să facă lumea mai bună.

Dar asemenea lui erau și sunt mii de oameni respinși de familie sau marginalizați de comunitatea în care trăiesc și, din păcate, nu puțini aleg sinuciderea.

Pride Timișoara 2022

Îmi amintesc însă o poveste mai recentă, de acum câțiva ani. La unul din evenimentele de la Timişoara a venit la mine un puşti. Avea vreo 17 ani, venise de la vreo 200 de km. Era pentru prima oară la un eveniment LGBTQIA+, iar poveștile de viață auzite păreau din altă lume pentru el: erau oameni care au găsit echilibrul, care au învățat cum să gestioneze durerea și presiunea socială. A venit către mine cu multe întrebări și mi-a spus atunci că este prima dată când poate vorbi deschis, fără teamă. Mi-a povestit prin ce dramă trecea acasă, cu familia, la liceu. După o cruntă bătaie „de îndreptare”, părinții îl dăduseră afară din casă, dormea la o mătușă. Mi-a rămas în memorie bucuria de o clipă din ochii lui, dar şi tristețea şi întrebarea lui ca un ecou: „Cu ce am greșit?”. 

M-am gândit atunci ce diferență poate face un loc în care să te simți în siguranță, măcar pentru câteva ore, mi-am amintit ce înseamnă să nu poți vorbi cu nimeni și să trăiești însingurat cu o mulțime de întrebări. 

Pentru cei ca el, o banală conversație cu părinții, care ar trebui să-i ajute, să le fie alături, este deseori doar un moment în care sunt răniți iar şi iar. Adolescenți, tineri, adulți sau seniori, toți au nevoie de o comunitate incluzivă. Poveștile lor au fost pentru mine unul din motivele care m-au determinat să ies public, să încerc să-i ajut să fie auziți, să facem împreună lucrurile să se întâmple. 

Bucharest Pride 2022
Bucharest Pride 2022
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Editorial Board Recommendations

Subscribe to our newsletter

Marian Ursan, Executive Director of the Carousel: "Not even death plays fair with the people on the streets"

Marian Ursan, Executive Director of the Carousel: "Not even death plays fair with the people on the streets"

Marian Ursan is the Executive Director of the Carousel organization and fights for the rights of the homeless. Over the years, he says, people have become increasingly open to lend a helping hand. It was a pleasant surprise to discover this availability. However, the problems faced by vulnerable and homeless people are so serious that they need the intervention of the whole of society in order to be able to be solved.

You started working in the midst of vulnerable communities with HIV/AIDS, and then you started CAROUSEL. What was this transition like? 

I didn't get away from the HIV/AIDS problem. Even though we were talking initially about everything that hiv infection means, we realized that there are categories that are much more vulnerable compared to others in the face of HIV infection. 

For example, for a man who lives with HIV and eventually has access to treatment, how can he get his treatment if he is sitting on the street? Maybe he has lost his treatment, because he does not have a place to keep the pills safe. Somehow we have not re-profiled ourselves, but we have recalibrated our messages so that we are easier to understand. Let's explain that most of the time this problem is much more complex. We are also talking about the lack of identity documents or where to take a shower or where to wash some clothes, all kinds of things that affect the vulnerable. 

How did you think the community would react in the beginning? 

We were quite skeptical about the ability to attract resources. We realized that it's a field that's not attractive, that they're very hard-to-digest topics. We knew this and that's why we stubbornly went on to keep going in that direction. 

We are talking about a social service – it must be given to the people who need it. 

It's a delicate matter to promote and bring their message and problem into society. We're talking about people who face multiple vulnerabilities. Not only do they sit on the street, but they also have addiction problems, they are involved in drug use, alcohol, they do not have papers, and all this is gathered in a man you avoid on the street. 

For us, at first the most important thing was to understand what was happening in communities. We knew from the very beginning that what we were going to do was to weight this trend of aggravation of the situation. It wasn't something new to us, there weren't people we didn't know. 

How did the community respond to carousel's message and actions?

I was surprised to see that in most cases, I had good reactions. I was living in my movie, I was worried that people wouldn't understand. We underestimated the wider community and what we underestimated was business. We do not use public money, and then our funding option is aimed precisely at companies, individual donors and grants provided by international structures. 

We really wanted to attract private resources into our work, I mean the CSR components and, with a few exceptions, it worked. I imagined that it might be a risk for companies to associate their image with phenomena like this. This is where I was wrong. 

What have you learned over time about the organization? 

We realized that we needed to professionalize our services even more, beyond this direct work on the ground. We realized that we needed to update our website for which at first we had no passion. I said if someone wanted to get to know us, come here. Well, I was wrong. Someone had to help us completely redo our site, we learned how to talk about our work, how to be more transparent. 

What is the relationship like with partners and funders?

I have always believed and hoped that the relationship with a private financier is not limited to funding, but it means building a partnership together. We wanted people to get to know us, to know not just what we do on a certain component. We would like them to understand what we do in general in the organization, how we behave towards the needs of the people, how we try to mobilize those people to go much further, to have the strength and the confidence that they too can make a series of changes for the better. 

We always invite people to get to know us, to know our work and then to talk to those we help. That way it seems to me that there's a better understanding of how we work. There is a better understanding of the needs of those people, and it also seems to me that it is a very valuable source of ideas. Of course we have to keep a balance and not turn some of these services into a kind of tourism. It's important, too, but beyond that, it's important that there's transparency in your work and those who support you come to understand what's going on with the resources that they allocate. Whether we are talking about a man who donates a pair of boots, or we are talking about a company.

Was there the same openness from individual donors?

I think the level of trust is growing and the way the wider community gets involved encourages us. This feels different in a good, positive way, from year to year. I think about the number of people who call us, I think about the messages we get, the people who apply for volunteering, because they've heard of good things that we've done.

What was your soul campaign? How did the "Radio against Loneliness" campaign start?

The moment we thought about doing a radio campaign it was a little different because we didn't say about food, clothes, but about something that has to do with people, beyond all the problems, and the trend of aloneness that is increasing from day to day. 

We started distributing radios in the pandemic. If you remember, the streets were deserted except for those who had nowhere to go. There was a fantastic lack of information and all that people knew on the street is what they heard from some, from others, who were more vocal. Most of the time it wasn't valid information, we realized that people had nowhere to get information. At that time, if we talk about the Internet and TV, we know what the information was, and then we realized that the idea of radio would fit, because on the radio for now the information has remained in a correct area. How to get people to access information especially those related to covid? 

We realized from their reactions that the effect was much stronger and it wasn't limited to a series of information about COVID, but rather people were saying that they were glad to hear something else, even music. In one way or another for them, being alone on the street, it was less difficult and that's when we realized that here is an aspect that somehow we neglected, not as an organization, but also as a society. In one way or another we contribute to the alienation of people.  

I remember when we distributed the first radios, people kept changing stations until they came across a voice, didn't stop at the music or I know what; they listened to a voice, that's what they wanted to hear. A lot of people liked the radio theater, the stories. 

What are the obstacles at the moment, for organizations like CAROUSEL?

We need a lot of things, but at the same time we are aware that the biggest and strongest wall of the past I think is the one related to how people access health services. 

We all know that this problem is not one related only to a certain social category that has a significant difficulty in accessing these medical services. We all know or know someone, who was not feeling well, but thought two or three times before going to the hospital or the doctor, because he anticipated that the system was not OK, that they would not benefit from services as he would like. Here it seems to me that it is a structural deficiency, and this is reflected much more oppressively in the case of people who face poverty. 

We're not just talking about the reactions of people in the system, we're also talking about how many obstacles you have before you get in front of a doctor. I am referring here to the lack of identity documents, the lack of a family doctor to prepare a referral for you, the health card, the insurances, all the barriers to which are added and the lack of empathy on the part of some. The ones in whom you put your last hope.

What stories from the community do you carry with you?

99% of stories are sad because they are stories where people die. They die alone, in the bushes, in the street, away from the people they love. We have a collection of pictures in the organization and when I go through them, they relive very difficult moments. 

Ultimately, not even death plays fair with them. The people we are talking about now, no decent death can have: to be dressed, to have taken a bath, to have eaten before, to have listened to a kind word from someone. I think we have a duty to look at society as well, because for this situation, one man cannot be made responsible. 

 

Photo source: Personal Facebook Page and Carousel 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Editorial Board Recommendations

Subscribe to our newsletter

Why do we need community foundations?

Why do we need community foundations?

Sunt în ARC de aproape 8 ani și vreo 5 din ei au fost despre fundațiile comunitare, despre ce pot eu să ofer sau despre cum pot aduce plus-valoare în activitatea lor. Vă povestesc mai jos câteva din lucrurile pe care le-am învățat.

Text by George Vlas

Fundațiile Comunitare sunt parte din comunitățile în care activează și produc schimbări pozitive, prin abordarea strategică a problemelor cu care se confruntă, fie că este vorba de educație, sănătate, mediu sau cultură. Mișcarea fundațiilor a apărut ca răspuns la aceste probleme și încearcă să se conecteze la nevoile oamenilor, contribuind la îmbunătățirea unor procese sociale sau educaționale, iar, în cele din urmă, la calitatea vieții locuitorilor. Sunt organizații orientate spre comunitate și nevoile acesteia, atrag resurse locale, constituie fonduri și reinvestesc social. 

Am lucrat cu fundațiile ani buni, pe două paliere: am oferit consultanță și am colectat date despre activitatea lor, pentru a trasa niște coordonate care să arate vizual impactul pe care îl au în și asupra comunităților în care trăiesc și activează. Le-am vorbit constant despre Salesforce, cum să integreze managementul datelor în viața organizației și am încercat să le arăt utilitatea datelor. 

George Vlas (middle)

Am încercat să văd implicarea lor în comunitate și dezvoltarea ei și dintr-o altă perspectivă, una academică. M-am orientat spre un doctorat din care să reiasă importanța lor în dezvoltarea locală. Sunt foarte puține studii și cercetări care arată impactul unor astfel de organizații în România. De aceea, nevoia de a analiza această implicare este și mai mare, pentru a identifica trenduri și modele de implicare comunitară și de a îmbogăți literatura de specialitate. Există unele statistici, însă nu avem analize științifice care să ne ajute să identificăm cauzelor care au dus la un anumit comportament sau o anumită implicare. Mai mult, nu avem alte dovezi decât ceea ce poți vedea sau ceea ce este palpabil.

Un pas spre înțelegerea rolului fundațiilor în dezvoltarea comunitară a fost realizarea unui studiu în 2021. Studiul oferă o perspectivă complexă asupra dezvoltării comunitare din România, pornind de la impactul unui fond implementat și dezvoltat de fundațiile comunitare. Mai exact, ne referim la Fondul pentru un viitor mai bun în comunitate, coordonat de Federația Fundațiile Comunitare din România și finanțat de LIDL România. Fondul a fost lansat în 2020 cu 5 fundații comunitare, iar în fiecare an mai multe fundații sunt implicate. 

Acest fond nu se concentrează neapărat pe nevoile comunităților în care activează fundațiile, ci urmărește să ajungă și în comunități în care activismul comunitar este la un nivel scăzut (de exemplu, Fundația Comunitară Iași implementează acest fond în Botoșani). Prin intermediul acestui fond, organizațiile încearcă să ducă spiritul comunitar mai departe, să îl dezvolte și să creeze sau adapteze practici sănătoase de implicare din comunitățile lor și în comunitățile vecine.

Fondul se concentrează pe două domenii importante: educația și mediul înconjurător. Prin proiecte de educație informală și non-formală, membrii comunității învață cum să se implice activ, cum să interacționeze și cum să fie exemple pentru ceilalți. Totodată, învață cum să protejeze mediul înconjurător, prin proiecte locale, cu potențial de propagare la un nivel mai mare. Proiectele urmăresc crearea de mai mult spațiu verde în orașele aglomerate, mai multe locuri de relaxare, conectarea educației de mediul înconjurător sau să ofere spații de interacțiune și dezvoltare pentru tinerii din comunitate, să-i determine să se implice în comunitățile lor de la vârste cât mai mici.

Fondul pentru un viitor mai bun în comunități promovează acțiuni de implicare comunitară diverse, precum amenajarea unor grădini urbane, educația prin artă, dezvoltarea competențelor digitale, crearea unor spații comunitare incluzive sau revitalizarea cartierelor unor orașe. Iar faptul că unele fundații își orientează eforturile și în afara comunităților lor este o dovadă a interesului față de ideea de comunitate în sine, de deschidere față de potențialul unor zone și dezvoltarea acestora. Și, desigur, de a capta atenția cetățenilor și a posibililor finanțatori pentru a se implica și a genera plus-valoare în comunitățile lor, creând spațiu de colaborare și dezvoltare.

Spații din orașe, poate uitate sau care nu au reprezentat interes, devin puncte de interes pentru cetățeni și autorități, pentru viitoare finanțări și pentru utilizarea spațiilor respective în scopuri diverse, cu participarea membrilor comunității. Sunt locuri în care e posibil să existe potențial de dezvoltare, să existe mecanismele necesare și oamenii potriviți, însă să lipsească resursa financiară și viziunea de a porni o „revoluție a dezvoltării”. 

 

How Brăila Youth Hub appeared

Fundația Comunitară Galați a implementat acest fond în Brăila. Organizația și-a orientat o parte din activitate spre o altă comunitate, un alt oraș, un alt județ; din apropiere, ce-i drept, însă o comunitate străină lor. Nevoi pe care nu le cunoșteau sau le cunoșteau mai puțin, un profil comunitar străin și oameni pe care nu îi cunoșteau. În 2020, opt organizații neguvernamentale sau grupuri de inițiativă locală au răspuns apelului fundației, au abordat și propus soluții și îmbunătățiri ale sistemului educațional local și al spațiilor verzi din oraș, o conectare între cele două, reabilitarea lor și o reconectare cu oamenii.

For the first time in Braila, a youth center was opened, which brings together groups with common interests. Olympic students, who excel in fields such as astrophysics, web design, acting, personal development, programming, but also teachers and experts, who offer their time and knowledge voluntarily, benefit, with the help of this fund, from a common space where they can express their passions and develop them. Interact with other people with common interests and passions and spend their free time in a constructive way.

Centrul este un loc incluziv, care permite tinerilor din comunitatea brăileană să-și împărtășească interese comune și să se dezvolte personal și profesional. 

Centrul oferă cursuri și activități de învățare non-formală, într-un mod interactiv, prin transmiterea și sedimentarea informațiilor, alternativ sistemului public de educație, cu ajutorul și implicarea directă a tinerilor. Sesiunile de învățare și atelierele sunt adaptate vârstei celor implicați, modul de abordare este unul aplicat, care vizează utilitatea lor în viața oricărui tânăr.

Ce e și mai important este că centrul își continuă activitatea și după perioada de implementare a fondului și promovează voluntariatul, caută și adună la un loc oportunități de implicare a tinerilor în comunitate, îi informează prin intermediul paginii de socializare, se implică în discuții care țin de comunitate și nevoile ei, participă la întâlniri și forumuri pentru tineri (Forumul Tinerilor din Brăila) și organizează și campanii de strângere de fonduri pentru cauze locale (rechizite școlare pentru copii fără posibilități materiale, cadouri de Crăciun). 

***

Implicarea fundațiilor comunitare în astfel de zone/orașe este necesară, în mare măsură fiindcă ONG-urile de tineret devin din ce în ce mai puține, la nivel județean, la fel și oportunitățile de voluntariat și implicare civică, dialogul structurat sau cursurile de dezvoltare personală gratuite, care sunt extrem de necesare în dezvoltarea personală și profesională a tinerilor. Prin fonduri create special pentru alte comunități, fundațiile comunitare redau oamenilor speranța că se poate, că ne putem implica, indiferent că vorbim de comunitatea în care trăim zi de zi, comunitatea de care simțim că aparținem sau o comunitate pe care o avem la suflet.

***

George Vlas is a PhD student at Babeș Bolyai University in Cluj-Napoca, and his thesis focuses on the involvement of non-governmental organizations in community development. 

At the Association for Community Relations, he works as a database specialist and researcher.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Editorial Board Recommendations

Subscribe to our newsletter

When it begins to "see the trace at the mop"

When it begins to "see the trace at the mop"

Text by Silvia Boeriu, Resource Center for Public Participation

Civic engagement is no longer as abstract as it was 10 years ago, when colleagues at the Resource Center for Public Participation (CeRe) were doing community organizing in neighborhoods. They said they were confused with sellers of forks, bedding or whatever else was in vogue at teleshopping. Years passed, colleagues old and new went arm in arm with hundreds of people and dozens of groups in their effort to convince the administration to solve problems in the communities. Now, in Bucharest alone, there are over 20 initiative groups that exchange experience and support each other. 

"Come on you can see the trace at the mop!" said Oana Preda, executive director of CeRe and one of the people who founded the organization 14 years ago. Then it was a beautiful dream that people would organize themselves "by themselves" to make the mayors and councilors of Bucharest more attentive to the city's problems, and the concept of community organization looked more like a postcard received from America, on which it wrote "Just do it". 

That's how the CeRe story began: we started doing it. I've seen the trace from the mop every time the groups and people I've learned what it's like with petition, with community mobilization, with protest or with the fierce attempts to get to council meetings have begun to trust that every little or more civic success inspires others, that these successes matter, and that. above all, it changes perceptions. It's just that the mop has to be watered all the time to keep seeing the traces, plus there are others who step more pressed and leave different traces on your mop trail. Traces that make you wonder if your effort matters and if we will ever be enough and vocal enough to cleanse the public administration of its "you can't, Mr. Citizen, we know better!"

A galactic Mr. Proper would probably tell us that even if he did the civic job along with ten trucks of mops, there would still be a lot of work to be done around the corners. No one is looking for perfection. That's what we, CeRe, are up to show what advocacy work is all about, who does it, and especially why mop footprints are important. The story now is about how civic engagement in big cities differs from that in smaller localities or villages. 

Sometimes the trace of the mop is not seen from the plane, but it means access to decent housing or access to health services and public transport for communities.

For a group of women from a village in Giurgiu County, preoccupied with solving problems such as the lack of arrangement of a park and a playground in their village, the interactions with the mayor had unpleasant consequences. A representative of the city hall drew the attention of the civic ladies' partners that he was coming to check their building permits of the houses in the village, if their wives do not "let it softer". That's kind of the way it is with civism in small communities. 

Everyone knows everyone and if you have "disturbing" initiatives for the people in the city hall, you find yourself not talking to you half the village anymore. At the same time, experience has shown us that in rural areas the communication of civic groups with local authorities tends to take place faster than in cities, and trust relations between group members and the community are easier to build. As in the city, however, in order to influence public decisions, the large numbers of citizens who support civic initiatives and the level at which the community feels represented by the topics chosen by the groups are equally important. 

In Merișani commune, Arges County, access to public health services was much restricted for the community, especially for women with low incomes, who, although they crossed long distances in Pitesti, did not have the possibility to perform abdominal ultrasounds of pregnancy, settled by the state. It was a long way before the Pitesti County Hospital purchased an ultrasound to be available in the hospital's outpatient setting. And this service became possible after the Partner for You Association (APT) supported an intense advocacy campaign at the county level. A first for the vulnerable community in Merișani was also the APT campaign, which convinced the local authority to allocate homeland to families who were facing multiple economic and social vulnerabilities. For both endeavors, the constant involvement in advocacy actions has made possible these civic paths worthy of admiration. 

The civic life in the village also has its strengths, from the perspective of the proximity of the members of the civic groups for offline work meetings, but also through the fact that the wishes expressed by the community are prioritized. In the village of Ciobotea (jud. Arges), the problem of the lack of local public transport puts in difficulty many families forced to walk long distances to get to school, jobs or other activities in the daily routine. Supported by Sorina Bunescu and the CeRe team, the young people from Ciobotea decided to bring the problem of the lack of local transport to the attention of the authorities. For months, community meetings were held to identify the most effective tactics to empower the authorities to solve the problem. Among the actions that had the greatest impact were the postcards that the young people in the group made and transmitted to the county administration. Postcards included photos and messages about the community's need for access to public transportation. Following the campaign, the County Council included in the Public Transport Plan a route that connects Ciobotea with the rest of the world.

Let's go back to the mop and its footprints. Civic engagement is leaving signs now, when people and groups manage to convince the authorities to solve various things that are not going well in communities. But the traces of the mop are also seen over time, when more and more people draw inspiration from the stories of civic success and learn from each other what it's like with participation and how they bring people together for a common cause. 

There are no "recipes" that guarantee civic successes, only people who are very determined to change something. The more, the more diverse, the better. The more motivated and persistent they are, the greater the chances that their initiatives will be heard and replicated. There are individuals and groups who are looking for us to work together on their campaign plan, and other groups and organizations we stay for almost a year or two, until they manage to get their project closer to success. There are groups that we work with and that cease their activity immediately after solving the urgency of their actions, but there are also initiative groups with a few members, which turn into associations. All these initiatives are changing perceptions in the long run. Let us no longer be afraid to pull the sleeve of public authority and dare more to demand change. At Merișani and Ciobotea, trust was planted!

 

*Photos belong to CeRe

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Editorial Board Recommendations

Subscribe to our newsletter